Entities
View all entitiesIncident Stats
CSETv1 Taxonomy Classifications
Taxonomy DetailsIncident Number
290
CSETv1_Annotator-1 Taxonomy Classifications
Taxonomy DetailsIncident Number
290
Incident Reports
Reports Timeline
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2534/e253412ea4b3996d00bc9931c4cd3e8c91ca3e5b" alt="Safe for swimming? Toronto’s new tool for measuring water quality at its beaches is misleading, say advocates"
- View the original report at its source
- View the report at the Internet Archive
A safe water advocacy group is concerned for the health of Toronto beachgoers after the city’s new water quality monitoring system appears to have repeatedly allowed contaminated beaches to remain open.
This summer, the city quietly adopted…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1833b/1833b13dece9e96c93186136cc98ed39ccd1644a" alt="Toronto Tapped Artificial Intelligence to Warn Swimmers. The Experiment Failed"
- View the original report at its source
- View the report at the Internet Archive
Earlier this year, Toronto's public health department quietly flipped the switch on an experiment targeting the city's most pollution-prone beaches.
Instead of relying on day-old laboratory tests to ensure that people don't swim in unsafe w…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ca7c/4ca7c0851e1c4ba0ccb561f970b13701133c6c70" alt="The bait and switch behind AI risk prediction tools"
- View the original report at its source
- View the report at the Internet Archive
Toronto recently used an AI tool to predict when a public beach will be safe. It went horribly awry.
The developer claimed the tool achieved over 90% accuracy in predicting when beaches would be safe to swim in. But the tool did much worse…